For the first time in ages, not a single winner thanked Jesus in their acceptance speech. What gives? Is Hollywood losing its spiritual edge? With that slight in mind, let's look at last night's Academy Awards presentation in terms of the Ten Commandments God reserves for the annual telecast.
1. Thou Shalt Not Debase the Oscars in the Show's First Thirty Seconds. I like Neil Patrick Harris, but besides the jarring experience of seeing him open the awards instead of the heavily promoted co-hosts, I found his glitzy musical number horribly written and executed. Sorry, Neil, I usually love splashy and sarcastic numbers like that but it was too soon in the show and way too weak. The day before, hyperbolic producer Adam Shankman called it “the most dynamic opening, from drama to spectacle to humor, that has ever been staged.” Um…no. The near-naked showgirls were over-the-top and meaningless (if they really wanted to get our attention, why not gyrating showboys to accompany the openly gay star?) and the references to things like masturbation and prison rape (hello?) were just not funny. I like ribald as much as the next guy but come on. Did he really just mention Dolly Parton’s hooters? Hey, Neil, 1983 called—it wants its joke back! This was one of the worst beginnings in Oscar history and almost makes me long for Rob Lowe’s infamous duet with Snow White. Maybe Hugh Jackman could have pulled it off.
2. Thou Shall Not Squander Great Talent. I thought getting Alec Baldwin and Steve Martin to host together was an inspired move and they didn’t disappoint. Except they were barely there. Remember when a host was really a host? Think Bob Hope, Billy Crystal, even Johnny Carson. They used to hold the show together, providing continuity and recovery from the frequent cringe-producing moments. Baldwin and Martin disappeared for most of the overlong show. When they were there, they were usually funny, even when they were reading dumb jokes. I admit I laughed out loud when Steve introduced “that damn Helen Mirren.” “Not damn,” Alec replied. “It’s DAME!” In general I found the writing subpar this year (where was the biting political commentary that is usually sprinkled throughout the show?). But the little clips of Alec and Steve in bed and watching the show in their Snugglis were spot-on.
3. Thou Shalt Not Sell Your Soul to Get a Better Demographic. I was scared by the producers’ frequent comments leading up to the show that they were trying to attract a younger crowd this year. My worst fears were realized by the vapid teen stars they dragged out throughout the show who had absolutely no business on that stage. I don’t mean to be ageist, and believe me, there is a long list of amazingly talented young performers that should have been up there, from Abigail Breslin and Saoirse Ronan to Mia Wasikowsa and anyone from the “Harry Potter” cast. So why trot out people like Miley Cyrus, Taylor Lautner, and Kristen Stewart? Is their presence really going to make young people watch this show? I think not. Compared to them, Zac Efron, also on hand for the teens, seemed like Laurence Olivier. Oy. Memo to Young Hollywood: SPIT YOUR GUM OUT before going on national television! Yikes. I'm surprised they weren't texting from the stage.
4. Thou Shalt Not Humiliate Yourself in Front of a Billion People. The only truly embarrassing moment came after “Music for Prudence” was named Best Short Documentary. Director-producer Roger Ross Williams had just started an eloquent speech when producer Elinor Burkett burst onto the stage and cut Williams off, Kanye West-style. She mumbled something about women never getting to speak which seemed totally bizarre for the moment and then launched into her own rambling speech, never giving Williams the chance to finish his thoughts. Ouch. Until this morning I believed this was just an accident caused by the over-excitement of the moment. I was surprised to hear that it was all quite deliberate, that Burkett was disgruntled over the direction the film had taken and felt she should have been given the award because it was her original idea. Burkett claimed that Williams rushed to the stage and that his mother tried to block her with her cane. Oh well, this ugly moment may make people remember the mostly unseen film.
5. Thou Shalt Not Be Smug or Ungracious. Again, I want to give the offender the benefit of the doubt and chalk her faux pas up to nerves, but when Sandy Powell won the Oscar for Best Costume Design for the wonderful film “The Young Victoria,” she looked blandly at the award and said “I’ve already got two of these at home so I’m feeling greedy.” It doesn’t sound that bad in print but it didn’t go over well on the Kodak stage, causing me to shout, “So give it back! How about Colleen Atwood for ‘Nine’ or Catherine Leterrier for “Coco Before Chanel’?” Then she dedicated her Oscar to other costume designers but again, her sentiments fell flat. “This one’s for you but I’m going to take it home tonight, thank you.” Oy, Sandy. I think it's a given that multiple award winners should never refer to their previous Oscars in front of hundreds of people who would sell their mother for a single one.
6. Thou Shalt Not Hire Gratuitous Street Dancers. In my opinion, the most appalling sequence of the entire night was the series of interpretive dances to the Best Film Score nominees. Let me be clear: the dancing was extraordinary, no doubt about it, but the dances had absolutely nothing to do with the style or content of the films they were depicting. We know this number was producer Adam Shankman’s baby, he of “So You Think You Can Dance” fame, and I hear that many of the dancers came directly from that show. But why? For this they took away all performances of the Best Song nominees? It added absolutely nothing to the telecast and was a muddled, stylistically incoherent mess. Paging Debbie Allen! At least her dance extravaganzas attempted to relate to the films at hand.
7. Thou Shalt Not Dishonor the Dead. First of all, I love James Taylor, but can we end the practice of a live performance during the clips of people who have died during the year and instead just focus on the video? The problem with the performance is that the camera focuses on that individual with the video screen in the background and we are unable to read the names of the people being memorialized. But the real travesty, as usual, were the omissions. Where, I ask you, were Farah Fawcett and Henry Gibson? Sure, they rose to fame in other mediums (hello Michael Jackson, who WAS honored) but Fawcett and Gibson were both excellent actors who did some wonderful work on the screen. Outrageous.
8. Thou Shalt Not Play Favorites with the Dead. I’ve got nothing against director John Hughes, who died way too young and who made some excellent iconic films, but what was the deal with the loooong tribute to the deceased director? Former Hughes favorite Molly Ringwald looked bizarre and terrified as she haltingly talked about the director with Ferris Bueller himself, Matthew Broderick. Then, in this never-ending sequence, the curtain opened to reveal several members of Hughes’ 1980s Brat Pack along with some stars of his other films. Apart from the shock value of seeing how some of the Brat Packers had aged, I found the whole tribute a bit out of place. Especially since the Academy decided to brush off this year’s living honorees, Lauren Bacall, cinematographer Gordon Willis, and director Roger Corman in an untelevised event. Why? So we can watch Shankman’s dancers breakdance the diffusing of a bomb in “The Hurt Locker” sequence? At least they showed a clip of the dinner with Bacall screeching, “The thought that when I get home I'm going to have a two-legged man in my room is so exciting I can hardly stand it!” But when they came back to Bacall at the actual Oscar telecast, they practically had to beg the audience to acknowledge her.
9. Thou Shalt Not Fuck Up the Clips Segment. What, in God’s name, was the salute to horror films about? Or, as pronounced by incompetent Pretty Young Presenters Taylor Lautner and Kirsten Stewart, “Whore Films.” Couldn’t they at least have made up a reason for this out-of-place segment? The hundredth anniversary of the first silent horror film? The 50th anniversary of one of Hitchock’s classic films? No reason, other than to shove gratuitous scenes of the shirtless studs from “Twilight” (gotta get that young demographic!) in between clips of well made horror films and a slew of films that didn't belong there at all. The clips features are often my favorite part of the show, but they absolutely need a proper context. Can we all agree that there’s no reason to bring back this year’s producers, Bill Mechanic and Adam Shankman? I’m not saying it’s an easy gig, I just think all their instincts were dead-wrong. Who produced last year? That was one of the best shows in a long time, and not just because goddess Kate Winslet won for Best Actress.10. Thou Shalt Not Patronize Half the Population. Seeing rare Oscar attendee Barbra Streisand appear to dish out the Best Director award, I thought maybe it had leaked that Kathryn Bigelow was going to win and become the first woman to get the prize. Why else would Babs be there? (Am I the only one who thought she should have won the Best Director prize for “Yentl”?) The way Barbra and the announcer kept stressing this year the Best Director Oscar could go to the first woman or African-American actually had me feeling sorry for James Cameron (not an easy feat). Oh, yeah, and those other two white guys, whoever they were. Bigelow did win, gave a classy speech, and I’m sure was most worthy of the award (I still haven’t seen “The Hurt Locker”), but who made the asinine decision to have the orchestra play “I am woman, hear me roar!” as Streisand and Bigelow left the stage? Jesus Christ. Would they have played “We Shall Overcome” if Lee Daniels had won?
I give the overall show a solid C, even with the appealing team of Baldwin and Martin at the helm. That said, I have no problem with the winners, and I correctly guessed on all but one of the awards. I knew picking Gabourey Sidibe was a long-shot and I did it only because I couldn’t bear to imagine anyone who starred in last year’s execrable “All About Steve” winning the Best Actress Oscar. I still haven’t seen “The Blind Side” but I thought Sandra Bullock's speech was perfect. Jeff Bridges was very deserving and very sweet, Christoph Waltz sincere and a little scary, and Mo’Nique intense and moving. I found trotting out the nominees at the top of the show unnecessary and the bit of having the actors' pals pay tribute to them as their award was being announced probably sounded better in the planning stage (it didn’t hold a candle to last year’s beautiful moments when five former winners of that category talked about the nominees). Ben Stiller’s Naa'vi bit was mildly funny but what was the deal with Tom Hanks not even mentioning the ten nominees (too many!) for Best Picture and just blurting out “The Hurt Locker” as the winner? Talk about an anti-climax!
Oh well, at least Charlie enjoyed his first Oscars, even though he was deeply disappointed that his favorite actress Penelope Cruz didn’t win. There's always next year, Charlie!
I'm with you on most of your points, but I did like the John Hughes tribute. I thought the friends-introducing-the-nominees thing was a great idea, and it worked nicely for the male actors. It seemed a little forced and awkward for the females, though.
Posted by: Nichole | March 08, 2010 at 04:36 PM
Another big one missing in the memorial bit was Bea Arthur.
Posted by: Amy | March 08, 2010 at 04:47 PM
I feel bad that this was Charlie's first Oscar ceremony, because I fear that he will grow up not really appreciating old style Hollywood the way you do. Remember when everyone complained that the Academy was a bunch of old farts who just voted for obvious movies like Chariots of Fire? They were right, and it is cool that the Academy is younger and hipper and more open to women and minorities. But also seems a lot more commercial. I hate to sound like my mother, but it just doesn't have the same glamour of David Niven. Will the Hurt Locker be remembered in the same way as Lawrence of Arabia?
I'm almost wondering if the oscars should go the route of the golden globes, and just be a more intimate affair in a hotel where everyone seems drunk.
Every year the oscars suck, and then every year everyone watches it again. I'm curious what the ratings are --
Posted by: Neil | March 08, 2010 at 04:49 PM
By the way, the minute I got through watching the Oscars, my first thought was -- "What will Danny say?" Now that is branding! (not sure if you take this as a compliment or insult)
Posted by: Neil | March 08, 2010 at 04:50 PM
I agree with 95% of this. I wish I could remember the 5% I don't agree with but then I'd have to go back and reread it all and I'm far too lazy for that.
Neil Patrick Harris opening was really embarrassing. More Alec and Steve, without a doubt and the young kids? I think I speak for the majority when I say "Who the hell are you and we don't care."
Found you though Neilochka on Twitter and this was the best Oscar wrap up I've read.
Posted by: Suzy | March 08, 2010 at 04:50 PM
Dear Danny,
You must have been reading my mind, because I agree with every single word that you said. Also, I thought that it was really odd having one actor standing on a little platform, at the back of the theater, with his back to the audience, rattling on about something (Best Picture nominations ?). One more thing: Steve Martin, with his white hair and black rimmed glasses, looked like the lead character in, "Up." LOL.
Thanks,
Gordon
Posted by: Gordon | March 08, 2010 at 05:30 PM
A Brilliant assessment Danny! I think you were generous with your grade, i thought it was the worst, most uninspired, terribly produced Oscars of my lifetime! I grade it a C- or D! The gowns were great this year! More tastetful, less boob!
Posted by: susie specter | March 08, 2010 at 05:52 PM
Agree, agree, agree, agree, AGREE!
And to think they won't let Jon Stewart host because he was too mean? PLEASE.
Posted by: Stephanie/seenonflickr | March 08, 2010 at 06:41 PM
I've been waiting all day for your review! As usual, your comments are spot on. I didn't watch the whole thing, but I saw enough to remind myself that I really should stop watching the Oscars altogether. Thanks for the shots of Charlie--so cute!
Posted by: Julie R. | March 08, 2010 at 06:49 PM
Perfect assessment, Danny! It pissed me off so much last year when they ruined the "In Memoriam" montage by shooting the monitors onstage instead of showing it full screen... and then they did it again this year!! WTF? Completely lost all meaning, and, dare I say, it used to be kind of my favorite part of the Oscars. And, why they have to stint on the time for the montage in favor of other wastes of time is beyond me. Oh, and Inglorious Basterds was robbed.
Posted by: Pam P. | March 08, 2010 at 08:16 PM
Danny - I too have been waiting since the show ended to see what you would write - and you didn't disappoint! All I can say is, "exactly!"
...and Charlie is cuter and cuter every day!
Posted by: Barbara | March 08, 2010 at 08:45 PM
You were too kind. It was the worst one in a long time. Wasn't the ending rushed? Tom Hanks walked out and announced the winner. With 10 nominees maybe they didn't want him to read all the titles, but I love that final moment when all the nominees are still possible winners.
Posted by: Frances | March 08, 2010 at 08:53 PM
This is the best Oscars recap that I've read! Great points! I also laughed out loud at some points... particularly this line:
Bigelow did win, gave a classy speech, and I’m sure was most worthy of the award (I still haven’t seen “The Hurt Locker”), but who made the asinine decision to have the orchestra play “I am woman, hear me roar!” as Streisand and Bigelow left the stage? Jesus Christ. Would they have played “We Shall Overcome” if Lee Daniels had won?
Hilarious!!!
Great pictures of Charlies, too! He's gotten so big & is cuter than ever! =)
Posted by: Beth | March 08, 2010 at 09:52 PM
I don't think I ever felt so old as when I realized the great Bacall was relegated to the non-televised awards ceremony. I mean, for goodness sake she's LAUREN FRIGGIN BACALL!!!!
Does the Academy not remember Bogey and Bacall?
And you are so right, it looked as though they had to be cattle proded to give those recipients a standing O...what's that all about?
I've loved the Oscars because I always felt like it was the one opportunity (yes politics aside) for those in the business to honor their own. But now it seems to be a show to garner ratings not just for the movies presented but for the show itself.
Maybe they should take a year off, go back to the Roosevelt hotel and have a dinner (and drinks) with only those nominated in attendance. No TV cameras inside and maybe then the event would be about honoring the best in the business. Not just who can be the best at guaranteeing ratings.
And if that proves successful let's bring back the Brown Derby...the one shaped like the hat :)
I think I just miss old Hollywood
Posted by: Dave | March 09, 2010 at 12:21 AM
I agree with your commandments but want to point out that Bea Arthur was also overlooked in the memorial clips. Maude, overlooked? How could they?
Posted by: elizabeth | March 09, 2010 at 12:47 AM
I want anybody and everybody to read this review! The best and your best ever! I agree with just about every word. Perfection, Danny, perfection!
Posted by: tamarika | March 09, 2010 at 02:26 AM
This is the BEST review, most completely ON TARGET i have ever read of the oscars and especially of this year's!! i agree, they were plumb awful and you nailed it, dear danny! thank you, for at least making me laugh when all i wanted to do was weep after watching that abomidable thing. Also, i was completely in shock about that john hughes tribute....for lord's sake, it took up half the broadcast, with those people just mumbling repetitive phrases about him. and long live farrah!!!! xoxo
Posted by: pam allyn | March 09, 2010 at 03:54 AM
I think they should go back to 5, maybe 6 top movies. It gets too diluted with so many, and Tom Hanks' omission in naming all the nominated films was the symbolic admission that they can't handle honoring ten films.
Posted by: Cleo Gascoyne | March 09, 2010 at 05:16 AM
Dear Charlie,
Penelope Cruz is my favorite actress too. I want to be her when I grow up.
: )
Posted by: V-Grrrl @ Compost Studios | March 09, 2010 at 06:23 AM
Lauren Bacall is still stunning. No botox, no pretention. I wanted more of her. I was embarrassed by the I Am Woman, and wished Barbra had shown more restraint. She reminded me of the mother who'd been forced to elope then forced the huge showy wedding on the daughter who wanted a quiet, simple ceremony. Kathryn Bigelow has repeatedly said she doesn't want the modifier "first woman" before Oscar-winning director.
Thanks for the perfect wrap-up as I'm still cursing Adam Shankman for Hairspray and now this.
Posted by: Erica M | March 09, 2010 at 07:13 AM
Great review, Danny. I don't know why the Chicago newspaper tv critics didn't like Alec Baldwin and Steve Martin's opening. I was laughing SO hard. Yeah, and what the hell was Miley Cyrus doing up on stage besides looking nervous and hunched over? When I think Hollywood, she's the last person I think of. You MUST see "Hurt Locker", but be warned, it is extremely intense. My heart was pounding the entire duration of the movie.
Posted by: Danita Cherney | March 09, 2010 at 08:55 AM
Although I missed more than half of the Oscars, I still agree with your assessment about the show. I was confused about the dancers and would have preferred the songs themselves, even excerpts from the movies would have made more sense. I know I must see "Hurt Locker" but I wish I could see it in black and white, without all the blood. I was glad to read that the horror clips weren't that good. I loved horror films, but I would have been disappointed. I was also disappointed they didn't announce the names of all those who won Oscars for work behind the scenes,and were given awards elsewhere...why couldn't they scroll the names on the screen? Why couldn't Lauren Bacall accept the award onstage like they used to? Who needs Milley Cyrus on stage? Bring back Hayley Mills!!! A first Sandra Bullock gets Razzie on nite & Oscar the next! Shows the importance of good screenwriting!!!
I'll take first oscar for female director anyday!!! or if anyone wants to give me their extra Oscar!
when will we have first transgender Oscar winner? Great dramatic effect was Barbra saying it's about time, was it going to be an African American director or woman?
Posted by: Judy | March 09, 2010 at 10:57 AM
This is so perfect.
I was bored silly through most of it, and when the interpretive dancers came on I wanted to kick my TV in the nuts.
Also, Kristen Stewart's hipster bored look, throat clearing, scowling arrogance and twitchy leg shaking? Appalling. APPALLING.
Posted by: maggie, dammit | March 09, 2010 at 11:11 AM
Okay, everyone else said it: great review, Danny. I would only add this one tiny question: what was the deal with Mark Boal and Kathryn Bigelow at the end? He gave the thankyou speech--which didn't seem inappropriate--but why did he have her arm in a death grip? Why was she trying to get away? It was awkward beyond words and I haven't heard anyone comment on it.
Posted by: Jane | March 09, 2010 at 12:14 PM
Steve Martin and Alec Baldwin were also hanging onto Katheryn Bigelow as they closed the show.
Posted by: Kirk | March 09, 2010 at 01:16 PM
Great post! I actually didn't watch the Oscars, but I loved your recap! PS Charlie is adorable!!
Posted by: erin m | March 09, 2010 at 06:05 PM
Right on review, Danny, but I would have added "boooring". Charlie looked as cute as ever ..... hope he wasn't booord!
Love,
Bubbe Marilyn
Posted by: Marilyn Molnar | March 10, 2010 at 04:04 PM
One can never have too much Alec Baldwin or too many photos of adorable Charlie--love those Farmers Market pics too!
Posted by: sue | March 15, 2010 at 11:07 PM
Next year, I wanna view the Oscars with you.
Your 10 commandments were dead on and I found myself screaming much the same things at my TV.
Ugh -- the Twilight audience pandering.
And what would've Babs had said had Jim Cameron won?
That would have been *awkward*. Or maybe the fix was in...
See Hurt Locker, though -- it truly is extraordinary film making.
Charlie looks cute as evah.
xo
Posted by: Lori Kirkland Baker | March 16, 2010 at 10:49 AM
What a fun read--a fellow blogger sent me here, as I had done reviews of the nominated movies and/or actors. I picked the anticipated winners (mostly) but had other favs myself. I am a sucker for Helen Mirren, so I was rooting for her.
I am a big movies fan, and a big Oscar fan. I was also disappointed in the show, and really wondered what the heck the producers were thinking when they asked the bored kiddie stars who seem to have no sense of the movies.
Oh, speaking of chewing gum, even the wonderful Morgan Freeman was chomping away pre-show, while he was being interviewed. Sigh.
Posted by: KGMom | March 20, 2010 at 07:15 PM
Your second commandment is spot on. Had we seen more of them, your other nine commandments might not have been so annoying. Sandy Powell was a jerk. I was embarrassed watching her.
Posted by: Chris | March 21, 2010 at 05:47 PM
PS: Biting tongue as I look at Charlie.
Posted by: Chris | March 21, 2010 at 05:49 PM
somebody else who didn't see the humor and dignity in Sandy Powell's speech , amazing ! It was the oscars not the peace prize she won. What is she supposed to say ! Thanks for another useless piece of junk! The oscars are about selling advertising space get your head around it ! And as for people being embarressed OY!
Posted by: Ann Grey | March 22, 2010 at 04:16 PM
"(Am I the only one who thought she should have won the Best Director prize for “Yentl”?)"
Yes.
Posted by: michael | March 29, 2010 at 09:14 PM